ARTHDEEP SINGH ALIAS DEEP vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/3198/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010089032026

Filing Number

CRM-M/1105/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/3198/2026

Registration Date

19-Jan-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARTHDEEP SINGH ALIAS DEEP

    Adv. KARANJEET SINGH BRAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/3198/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Arthdeep Singh in an NDPS Act case where 40 kg of heroin was allegedly recovered from co-accused persons. The court found that Singh was added as accused solely based on uncorroborated disclosure statements, with no direct evidence, recovery, or call details linking him to the offense. Given Singh's 8+ months custody, clean criminal record, and the trial's likely lengthy duration with no prosecution witnesses examined, the court deemed continued detention unjust and released him on bail with surety bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/3198/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/3198/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Arthdeep Singh in an NDPS Act case where 40 kg of heroin was allegedly recovered from co-accused persons. The court found that Singh was added as accused solely based on uncorroborated disclosure statements, with no direct evidence, recovery, or call details linking him to the offense. Given Singh's 8+ months custody, clean criminal record, and the trial's likely lengthy duration with no prosecution witnesses examined, the court deemed continued detention unjust and released him on bail with surety bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case