MAMTA vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/1732/2026
Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010086142026
e-Filing Number
17-01-2026
Filing Number
CWP/645/2026
Filing Date
17-Jan-2026
Registration No
CWP/1732/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda
Coram
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Deepak Manchanda
Bench Type
Double
Category
7 - ELECTION MATTERS ( 403 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAMTA
Adv. YASHDEEP NAIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Deepak ManchandaView PDF
Case Summary: CWP/1732/2026 - MAMTA v. STATE OF HARYANA Mamta sought to quash a notification scheduling the election for President of Zila Parishad, Panipat on 28.01.2026, claiming it caused him prejudice. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear in court, and the State counsel informed that the underlying grievance—the unfilled President post—had already been redressed as the position was subsequently filled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/1732/2026
Case Summary: CWP/1732/2026 - MAMTA v. STATE OF HARYANA Mamta sought to quash a notification scheduling the election for President of Zila Parishad, Panipat on 28.01.2026, claiming it caused him prejudice. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear in court, and the State counsel informed that the underlying grievance—the unfilled President post—had already been redressed as the position was subsequently filled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts