AXXXX ALIAS PXXX vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRR/123/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010084562026

Filing Number

CRR/871/2026

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRR/123/2026

Registration Date

19-Jan-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

37.21 - AGT.JUVENILE JUSTICE(CARE&PROTEC OF CHIL ACT 2000 ( 273 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AXXXX ALIAS PXXX

    Adv. RITESH PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    Summary of CRR/123/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petition of a 16-17 year old juvenile accused of serious crimes (injuring and dismembering a victim's body) and granted him bail despite the gravity of charges. Justice H.S. Grewal held that Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act mandates bail for juveniles as a matter of right, with denial permitted only in strong and extreme circumstances. The social investigation report showed no risk of the petitioner joining anti-social elements, prompting the court to set aside the earlier bail denial orders and release him on bail with a warning that any further criminal involvement would result in bail cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/123/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRR/123/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the petition of a 16-17 year old juvenile accused of serious crimes (injuring and dismembering a victim's body) and granted him bail despite the gravity of charges. Justice H.S. Grewal held that Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act mandates bail for juveniles as a matter of right, with denial permitted only in strong and extreme circumstances. The social investigation report showed no risk of the petitioner joining anti-social elements, prompting the court to set aside the earlier bail denial orders and release him on bail with a warning that any further criminal involvement would result in bail cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case