RAKESH KUMAR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/3389/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010083172026

Filing Number

CRM-M/802/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/3389/2026

Registration Date

20-Jan-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAKESH KUMAR

    Adv. HARKIRAT SINGH BHOGAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/3389/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Rakesh Kumar's petition to quash FIR No. 208 (dated 09.12.1999) registered under Sections 279, 337, 338, and 427 IPC at Police Station Mohali, finding that the parties had entered into a valid, voluntary compromise dated 19.08.2025. The trial court's report confirmed both the petitioner and complainant Gaurav Sharma gave statements without pressure or coercion, confirming the compromise's genuineness. Justice Sumeet Goel held that the offences were primarily private in nature and quashing the FIR would further substantial justice, applying established precedents permitting High Court jurisdiction under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 to quash proceedings in non-compoundable offences when supported by genuine compromise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/3389/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/3389/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed Rakesh Kumar's petition to quash FIR No. 208 (dated 09.12.1999) registered under Sections 279, 337, 338, and 427 IPC at Police Station Mohali, finding that the parties had entered into a valid, voluntary compromise dated 19.08.2025. The trial court's report confirmed both the petitioner and complainant Gaurav Sharma gave statements without pressure or coercion, confirming the compromise's genuineness. Justice Sumeet Goel held that the offences were primarily private in nature and quashing the FIR would further substantial justice, applying established precedents permitting High Court jurisdiction under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 to quash proceedings in non-compoundable offences when supported by genuine compromise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case