SUNDER AND ORS vs DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER HISAR AND ORS — CWP/1075/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010073362026

e-Filing Number

15-01-2026

Filing Number

CWP/190/2026

Filing Date

15-Jan-2026

Registration No

CWP/1075/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Bench Type

Single

Category

18.11 - LAND LAWS S.B. ( 448 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNDER AND ORS

    Adv. SUKESH KUMAR JINDAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER HISAR AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/1075/2026 The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty for the petitioners to file a fresh petition. The petitioners' counsel failed to produce certified copies of the Naksha 'Alif', 'Bey', and 'Zeem' (partition documents) required to substantiate their claim that their land was reduced by approximately 14 canals during partition proceedings. The court allowed withdrawal to enable filing a fresh petition with proper certified documentation within ten days, failing which it would not be entertained by the Registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/1075/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/1075/2026 The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty for the petitioners to file a fresh petition. The petitioners' counsel failed to produce certified copies of the Naksha 'Alif', 'Bey', and 'Zeem' (partition documents) required to substantiate their claim that their land was reduced by approximately 14 canals during partition proceedings. The court allowed withdrawal to enable filing a fresh petition with proper certified documentation within ten days, failing which it would not be entertained by the Registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case