KRISHAN KUMAR AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Advocate - ADVOCATE GENERAL HARYANA — CWP/1528/2020

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-Jan-2020

CNR: PHHC010071602020

Filing Number

CWP/3307/2020

Filing Date

17-Jan-2020

Registration No

CWP/1528/2020

Registration Date

18-Jan-2020

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Bench Type

Single

Category

58.26 - SERVICE-ENGINEERING-HARYANA(PWD,B&R&PUBLIC HEALTH ( 716 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRISHAN KUMAR AND OTHERS

    Adv. TEJPAL DHULL

  2. 2.ASHOK KUMAR

  3. 3.JAGDISH CHANDER

  4. 4.RAMIKESH

  5. 5.KULDEEP

  6. 6.SUNIL DUTT

  7. 7.DEVENDER

  8. 8.BALWAN SINGH

  9. 9.ROHTASH

  10. 10.JAGAT

  11. 11.DALBIR SINGH

  12. 12.SURESH KUMAR

  13. 13.KEHAR SINGH

  14. 14.NARENDER SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Advocate - ADVOCATE GENERAL HARYANA

  2. 2.ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF

  3. 3.GENERAL MANAGER

  4. 4.SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER

  5. 5.SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed the writ petition filed by Canal Patwari contractual employees seeking regularization under the 2014 policy. The court directed the State to examine individual regularization claims in accordance with the Supreme Court's principles laid down in the "Madan Singh" case, with the State counsel raising no objection to the proposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Jan-2020

    Other

  4. 17-Jan-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/1528/2020

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court allowed the writ petition filed by Canal Patwari contractual employees seeking regularization under the 2014 policy. The court directed the State to examine individual regularization claims in accordance with the Supreme Court's principles laid down in the "Madan Singh" case, with the State counsel raising no objection to the proposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case