VISHNU DAS VAISHNAV ALIAS RAJVIR SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/2758/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 07-Apr-2026

CNR: PHHC010071522026

Filing Number

CRM-M/213/2026

Filing Date

15-Jan-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/2758/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Coram

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Bench Type

Single

Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHNU DAS VAISHNAV ALIAS RAJVIR SINGH

    Adv. DILPREET SINGH GANDHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Rupinderjit ChahalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/2758/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Vishnu Das Vaishnav in an NDPS case involving 160 kgs of poppy straw. The court found that the petitioner was implicated solely on co-accused disclosure statements, which are inadmissible under Section 25 of the Evidence Act per Supreme Court precedent. With no corroborating evidence linking him to the contraband, over 9 months in custody, investigation complete, and only 2 of 18 prosecution witnesses examined, continued detention violated Article 21 rights and violated the principle that "bail is a rule, jail an exception." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/2758/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/2758/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Vishnu Das Vaishnav in an NDPS case involving 160 kgs of poppy straw. The court found that the petitioner was implicated solely on co-accused disclosure statements, which are inadmissible under Section 25 of the Evidence Act per Supreme Court precedent. With no corroborating evidence linking him to the contraband, over 9 months in custody, investigation complete, and only 2 of 18 prosecution witnesses examined, continued detention violated Article 21 rights and violated the principle that "bail is a rule, jail an exception." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case