PAWAN KUMAR vs NEELAM AND OTHERS — FAO/1220/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010050452022

Filing Number

FAO/2120/2022

Filing Date

14-Jan-2022

Registration No

FAO/1220/2022

Registration Date

28-Mar-2022

Judge

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Coram

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Category

500.56 - APPL FILED BY OWNER AND DRIVER ( 921 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAWAN KUMAR

    Adv. ROOPAK BANSAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NEELAM AND OTHERS

  2. 2.MOHIT

  3. 3.RAJA

  4. 4.CHOLAMANDLAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Sudeepti SharmaView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana partly allowed Pawan Kumar's appeal against a compensation award of Rs. 21,31,900 for a fatal tractor accident. While affirming that Kumar's rash and negligent driving caused Ram Mehar's death, the court modified the award to require the insurance company to pay compensation first (within three months) with liberty to recover from Kumar, rather than Kumar bearing sole liability, following Supreme Court precedent on motor accident claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Jan-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/1220/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana partly allowed Pawan Kumar's appeal against a compensation award of Rs. 21,31,900 for a fatal tractor accident. While affirming that Kumar's rash and negligent driving caused Ram Mehar's death, the court modified the award to require the insurance company to pay compensation first (within three months) with liberty to recover from Kumar, rather than Kumar bearing sole liability, following Supreme Court precedent on motor accident claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case