STATE BANK OF INDIA vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - Gaurav Goel — CWP/880/2023

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Jan-2023

CNR: PHHC010049072023

Filing Number

CWP/1834/2023

Filing Date

11-Jan-2023

Registration No

CWP/880/2023

Registration Date

13-Jan-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Bench Type

Double

Category

31.11 - FINANCIAL CORPORATION UOI D.B. ( 558 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE BANK OF INDIA

    Adv. MADHU DAYAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - Gaurav Goel

  2. 2.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE PATIALA

  3. 3.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PATIALA

  4. 4.KULBIR SINGH, SHO (Station House Officer)

  5. 5.SHREE RAGHUNATH MANDIR AND GAUSHALA SOCIETY REGISTERED

  6. 6.M/S SWAMI VIVEKANAND EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST

  7. 7.ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas Suri,mr. Justice Suvir SehgalView PDF

    The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted SBI's writ petition, directing state officials to restore possession of a secured asset to the Bank within 15 days of the trial court vacating its interim order or dismissing the civil suit. The Court held that despite a valid SARFAESI Act order delivering possession to SBI in 2018, respondent No.5 forcibly re-entered the premises in January 2023, and possession must be restored to the Bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jan-2023

    Other

  4. 11-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/880/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted SBI's writ petition, directing state officials to restore possession of a secured asset to the Bank within 15 days of the trial court vacating its interim order or dismissing the civil suit. The Court held that despite a valid SARFAESI Act order delivering possession to SBI in 2018, respondent No.5 forcibly re-entered the premises in January 2023, and possession must be restored to the Bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case