THE PRESIDENT, SHRI MAHAVIR JAIN GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL vs TRIPAT KAUR CHAWLA AND ORS Advocate - A.G. HARYANA — CR/313/2020

Case under No Acts Defined Section 1. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010046602020

Filing Number

CR/2161/2020

Filing Date

13-Jan-2020

Registration No

CR/313/2020

Registration Date

15-Jan-2020

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Bahl

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Bahl

Bench Type

Single

Category

30.1 - CIVIL REVISION(I.O. AND OTHERS) ( 504 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE PRESIDENT, SHRI MAHAVIR JAIN GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL

    Adv. AMIT JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TRIPAT KAUR CHAWLA AND ORS Advocate - A.G. HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OH HARYANA

  3. 3.SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF HARYANA

  4. 4.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas BahlView PDF

    Case Summary: CR/313/2020 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana partially allowed the school's revision petition challenging an execution order. The court reduced the back wages owed to the former teacher (Tripat Kaur Chawla) from Rs. 24,77,570 to Rs. 11,63,958 by deducting her documented income from ITR (2001-2010). The court held that while the teacher was entitled to back wages since her 1981 dismissal (upheld in 2010), her professional earnings during the employment period must be deducted to prevent unjust enrichment, balancing equities between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Jan-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/313/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR/313/2020 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana partially allowed the school's revision petition challenging an execution order. The court reduced the back wages owed to the former teacher (Tripat Kaur Chawla) from Rs. 24,77,570 to Rs. 11,63,958 by deducting her documented income from ITR (2001-2010). The court held that while the teacher was entitled to back wages since her 1981 dismissal (upheld in 2010), her professional earnings during the employment period must be deducted to prevent unjust enrichment, balancing equities between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case