THE PRESIDENT, SHRI MAHAVIR JAIN GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL vs TRIPAT KAUR CHAWLA AND ORS Advocate - A.G. HARYANA — CR/313/2020

Case under No Acts Defined Section 1. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

CNR: PHHC010046602020

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CR/2161/2020

Filing Date

13-01-2020

Registration No

CR/313/2020

Registration Date

15-01-2020

Judge

MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL

Coram

MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL

Bench Type

Single

Category

30.1 - CIVIL REVISION(I.O. AND OTHERS) ( 504 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

14th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined Section 1

Petitioner(s)

THE PRESIDENT, SHRI MAHAVIR JAIN GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL

Adv. AMIT JAIN

Respondent(s)

TRIPAT KAUR CHAWLA AND ORS Advocate - A.G. HARYANA

STATE OH HARYANA

SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF HARYANA

DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER

Orders

14-05-2026
MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL

Case Summary: CR/313/2020 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana partially allowed the school's revision petition challenging an execution order. The court reduced the back wages owed to the former teacher (Tripat Kaur Chawla) from Rs. 24,77,570 to Rs. 11,63,958 by deducting her documented income from ITR (2001-2010). The court held that while the teacher was entitled to back wages since her 1981 dismissal (upheld in 2010), her professional earnings during the employment period must be deducted to prevent unjust enrichment, balancing equities between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR/313/2020 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana partially allowed the school's revision petition challenging an execution order. The court reduced the back wages owed to the former teacher (Tripat Kaur Chawla) from Rs. 24,77,570 to Rs. 11,63,958 by deducting her documented income from ITR (2001-2010). The court held that while the teacher was entitled to back wages since her 1981 dismissal (upheld in 2010), her professional earnings during the employment period must be deducted to prevent unjust enrichment, balancing equities between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

No Acts Defined All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case