JAGSIR SINGH vs UOI AND OTHERS — CR/147/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 14-Jan-2025

CNR: PHHC010042362025

Filing Number

CR/1621/2025

Filing Date

10-Jan-2025

Registration No

CR/147/2025

Registration Date

10-Jan-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikram Aggarwal

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikram Aggarwal

Bench Type

Single

Category

30.13 - ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT ( 507 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGSIR SINGH

    Adv. RANJIT SAINI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UOI AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikram AggarwalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of seven consolidated revision petitions challenging the dismissal of a Section 36(2) application under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by UOI and NHAI regarding land acquisition for National Highway No. 71 widening. The court found the petitions inappropriate to entertain on merits since the dismissed application was filed by respondents (not petitioners), and directed petitioners to pursue remedies before the Executing Court while allowing respondents to press for early decision on their pending Section 34 petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR/147/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of seven consolidated revision petitions challenging the dismissal of a Section 36(2) application under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by UOI and NHAI regarding land acquisition for National Highway No. 71 widening. The court found the petitions inappropriate to entertain on merits since the dismissed application was filed by respondents (not petitioners), and directed petitioners to pursue remedies before the Executing Court while allowing respondents to press for early decision on their pending Section 34 petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case