MAHESH GOYAL AND ANR vs PRITAM KAUR TH LRS — CR/1267/2016
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010042332016
Filing Number
CR/1267/2016
Filing Date
17-Feb-2016
Registration No
CR/1267/2016
Registration Date
17-Feb-2016
Judge
Mr. Justice Pankaj Jain
Coram
Mr. Justice Pankaj Jain
Bench Type
Single
Category
48.5 - CRIMINAL TRANSFER PETITION (AGNST WOMEN) ( 266 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
14-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHESH GOYAL AND ANR
Adv. CHARANJIT SINGH BAKHSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRITAM KAUR TH LRS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-May-2026
Mr. Justice Pankaj JainView PDF
Case Summary: CR/1267/2016 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana modified the lower court's order closing plaintiffs' evidence, granting Mahesh Goyal and another one final opportunity to lead their complete evidence despite lack of diligence. The court rejected defendants' objection that they had already completed their evidence during the pending revision petition, finding that court procedure should not prejudice parties' rights. However, the court warned that failure to utilize this opportunity would result in the original closure order taking effect with no further extensions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Feb-2018
Mr. Justice Amit Rawal
-
15-Nov-2017
Mrs. Justice Rekha Mittal
-
02-Aug-2017
Mrs. Justice Rekha Mittal
-
05-May-2017
Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta
-
26-Aug-2016
Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta
-
26-Aug-2016
—
Mr. Justice Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon
-
25-Apr-2016
Mr. Justice Dr. Shekher Dhawan
-
25-Apr-2016
—
Mr. Justice Girish Agnihotri
-
30-Mar-2016
Mr. Justice Dr. Shekher Dhawan
-
30-Mar-2016
—
Mr. Justice Girish Agnihotri
-
09-Mar-2016
Mr. Justice Dr. Shekher Dhawan
-
09-Mar-2016
—
Mr. Justice Girish Agnihotri
-
23-Feb-2016
Mr. Justice Dr. Shekher Dhawan
-
23-Feb-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2016
Case filed
Registration No. CR/1267/2016
Case Summary: CR/1267/2016 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana modified the lower court's order closing plaintiffs' evidence, granting Mahesh Goyal and another one final opportunity to lead their complete evidence despite lack of diligence. The court rejected defendants' objection that they had already completed their evidence during the pending revision petition, finding that court procedure should not prejudice parties' rights. However, the court warned that failure to utilize this opportunity would result in the original closure order taking effect with no further extensions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts