HARBHAJAN SINGH vs MOHAN SINGH AND OTHERS — CRM-A/94/2025

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010014482025

Filing Number

CRA-AS/819/2025

Filing Date

07-Jan-2025

Registration No

CRM-A/94/2025

Registration Date

22-Jan-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Category

36.1 - LEAVE TO APPEAL ( 241 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARBHAJAN SINGH

    Adv. JASMEET SINGH GHUMMAN

  2. 2.HARBHAJAN SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHAN SINGH AND OTHERS

  2. 2.HARBHAJAN SINGH

  3. 3.NARESH KUMAR@MESHI

  4. 4.SEKHO

  5. 5.JOHNY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh BediView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-A/94/2025 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed a 12-day delay in filing and granted Harbhajan Singh's application seeking leave to appeal against an acquittal order dated 09.10.2024. The trial court had acquitted respondents of charges including attempt to murder, assault, and criminal conspiracy arising from a 2017 complaint. Following Supreme Court precedent establishing victims' unconditional right to appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C., the court directed the Sessions Judge to treat the leave application as a substantive appeal and forward the case for proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-A/94/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-A/94/2025 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed a 12-day delay in filing and granted Harbhajan Singh's application seeking leave to appeal against an acquittal order dated 09.10.2024. The trial court had acquitted respondents of charges including attempt to murder, assault, and criminal conspiracy arising from a 2017 complaint. Following Supreme Court precedent establishing victims' unconditional right to appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C., the court directed the Sessions Judge to treat the leave application as a substantive appeal and forward the case for proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case