SHER SINGH SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS AND ANR. vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CR/131/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010012162024
Filing Number
CR/431/2024
Filing Date
04-Jan-2024
Registration No
CR/131/2024
Registration Date
09-Jan-2024
Judge
Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja
Coram
Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
30.15 - LAND ACQUISITION ACT ( 509 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHER SINGH SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS AND ANR.
Adv. BHAGWAN SINGH
-
2.KARAN SINGH
-
3.MANJEET KUMAR
-
4.SUNITA
-
5.PARKASHI DEVI
-
6.LEELA SINGH THROUGH LRS DEVINDER
-
7.PINKI
-
8.ANITA
-
9.SAVITA
-
10.KAUSHILYA DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
-
2.HUDA
-
3.LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR
-
4.IMLA SINGH ALIAS AMI LAL
-
5.SURJA SINGH ALIAS SURAJ BHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harkesh ManujaView PDF
Case Summary: CR/131/2024 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed the petitioners' revision petition and set aside the executing court's dismissal of their execution application. The petitioners' land was acquired for HUDA's Rewari development project; though initially assessed at Rs. 12.5 lakh/acre, compensation was ultimately enhanced to Rs. 4,044/sq yard through RFA No. 1977 of 2012, where the petitioners were impleaded as proforma respondents. The court held that under Order 41 Rule 4 CPC, being impleaded as proforma respondents meant the enhanced compensation judgment applied to their rights, entitling them to file execution petitions. The executing court was directed to process their execution application for release of enhanced compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jan-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CR/131/2024
Case Summary: CR/131/2024 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed the petitioners' revision petition and set aside the executing court's dismissal of their execution application. The petitioners' land was acquired for HUDA's Rewari development project; though initially assessed at Rs. 12.5 lakh/acre, compensation was ultimately enhanced to Rs. 4,044/sq yard through RFA No. 1977 of 2012, where the petitioners were impleaded as proforma respondents. The court held that under Order 41 Rule 4 CPC, being impleaded as proforma respondents meant the enhanced compensation judgment applied to their rights, entitling them to file execution petitions. The executing court was directed to process their execution application for release of enhanced compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts