SWARAN KAUR vs JAGDISH RAM AND ANR — COCP/1397/2017

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010008892017

Filing Number

COCP/1397/2017

Filing Date

23-May-2017

Registration No

COCP/1397/2017

Registration Date

23-May-2017

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Category

1.11 - LPA GRANT/REFUSAL OF PERMIT ROUTE ( 335 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SWARAN KAUR

    Adv. Atam Prakash Setia

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAGDISH RAM AND ANR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepak GuptaView PDF

    Summary of COCP/1397/2017 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Swaran Kaur's pre-emption suits and contempt petition, finding that a 1990 decree granting her co-sharership status was collusive and designed solely to defeat prior contractual rights of the defendants-vendees. The court held the suits were unmaintainable due to non-impleadment of essential vendors and rejected allegations that subsequent property transfers violated court orders, as the underlying pre-emption claims failed on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jul-2018

    Mr Justice Jaswant Singh

  4. 25-May-2017

    Mrs Justice Daya Chaudhary

  5. 23-May-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. COCP/1397/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of COCP/1397/2017 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Swaran Kaur's pre-emption suits and contempt petition, finding that a 1990 decree granting her co-sharership status was collusive and designed solely to defeat prior contractual rights of the defendants-vendees. The court held the suits were unmaintainable due to non-impleadment of essential vendors and rejected allegations that subsequent property transfers violated court orders, as the underlying pre-emption claims failed on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case