Shiv Balak Ram, vs State of Bihar — MJC/5295/2019
Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC011329782019
Filing Number
MJC/41039/2019
Filing Date
18-Dec-2019
Registration No
MJC/5295/2019
Registration Date
18-Dec-2019
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shiv Balak Ram,
Adv. Ajay Kumar Gautam
-
2.Nand Kishore Singh,
-
3.Prabhu Ray,
-
4.Bharat Singh,
-
5.Ambika Singh,
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Adv. ,Vikas Ratan Bharti,Nikhil Kumar Agrawal 1123
-
2.Sri R.K. Mahajan,
-
3.Smt. Rekha Kumari,
-
4.Sri R.K. Mandal,
-
5.Sri Ajay Ray,
-
6.Sri Sanjeev Kumar Mishra,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
The petitioners sought contempt proceedings against state education officials and B.R.A. Bihar University authorities for willful disobedience of an October 26, 2018 order in an underlying civil writ case. The court disposed of the contempt petition after the University's Registrar submitted a memo dated December 23, 2022, showing that the petitioners' representation had been addressed, and granted the petitioners liberty to pursue further remedies if grievances remained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Lokadalat ( For Orders )
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
-
18-Dec-2019
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/5295/2019
The petitioners sought contempt proceedings against state education officials and B.R.A. Bihar University authorities for willful disobedience of an October 26, 2018 order in an underlying civil writ case. The court disposed of the contempt petition after the University's Registrar submitted a memo dated December 23, 2022, showing that the petitioners' representation had been addressed, and granted the petitioners liberty to pursue further remedies if grievances remained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts