Baidhnath Yadav vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/689/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC011297002025
e-Filing Number
12-12-2025
Filing Number
CWJC/29573/2025
Filing Date
12-Dec-2025
Registration No
CWJC/689/2026
Registration Date
17-Jan-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
LAND ACQUISITION ( 5900 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Baidhnath Yadav
Adv. Amarendra Nath Verma,SURBHI BHUSHAN,SURBHI BHUSHAN, ,SURBHI BHUSHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
Adv. ,ZEBA AKHTAR 1123
-
2.The Divisional Commissioner,
-
3.The District Collector,
-
4.The District Land Acquisition Officer,
-
5.The Anchal Adhikari,
-
6.National Highways Authority of India
Adv. Dr. Iti Suman
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary: CWJC/689/2026 Baidhnath Yadav challenged land acquisition proceedings for the NH-730 highway project, seeking compensation at current market rates instead of the arbitrarily determined rate in the acquisition notice, plus solatium, 9% interest, and additional damages. The High Court disposed of the petition, directing the petitioner to file a proper representation before the Arbitrator-cum-Divisional Commissioner within four weeks, with an assurance that any petition will be resolved in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
For Admission
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
-
19-Mar-2026
For Admission - Fresh Cases I
Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha
-
28-Jan-2026
For Admission - Fresh Cases I
Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha
-
19-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/689/2026
Case Summary: CWJC/689/2026 Baidhnath Yadav challenged land acquisition proceedings for the NH-730 highway project, seeking compensation at current market rates instead of the arbitrarily determined rate in the acquisition notice, plus solatium, 9% interest, and additional damages. The High Court disposed of the petition, directing the petitioner to file a proper representation before the Arbitrator-cum-Divisional Commissioner within four weeks, with an assurance that any petition will be resolved in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts