Bhim Sen Kumar vs Govind Mohan, The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Advocate - Additional Solicitor General, ,Kanak Verma — MJC/4107/2025

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 12. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC011294452025

e-Filing Number

12-12-2025

Filing Number

MJC/29534/2025

Filing Date

12-Dec-2025

Registration No

MJC/4107/2025

Registration Date

15-Dec-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

Coram

Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 12
Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bhim Sen Kumar

    Adv. Sanjay Kumar,SARVADEO SINGH,SARVADEO SINGH, ,MANGAL MURTI,BHASKAR BHUSHAN,DEVANSHU KUMAR,SARVADEO SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Govind Mohan, The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Advocate - Additional Solicitor General, ,Kanak Verma

  2. 2.Gyanendra Pratap Singh, The Director General of Police,

  3. 3.V.S. Sharma, The Deputy Inspector General of Police (Establishment),

  4. 4.Mitesh Jain, The Inspector General of Police (Personnel), CRPF,

  5. 5.Ravindra Bhagat, The Deputy Inspector General of Police,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Partha SarthyView PDF

    Case Summary: MJC/4107/2025 The Patna High Court dismissed Bhim Sen Kumar's contempt application against CRPF authorities, finding substantial compliance with its previous October 2025 order directing the DIGP to consider the petitioner's representation regarding APAR (Annual Performance Appraisal Report) grading and MACP (Modified Assured Career Progression) benefits. The DIGP issued a December 2025 order addressing the petitioner's grievance regarding below-benchmark APARs (2016-2021) and confirming MACP eligibility from August 2021, with APAR upgradation to be considered through appellate authority review. The court permitted the petitioner to separately challenge the DIGP's December order through appropriate legal remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Admission-I Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  4. 01-May-2026

    For Admission-I Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    For Admission-I Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    For Admission-I Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  7. 20-Mar-2026

    For Admission-I Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/4107/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MJC/4107/2025 The Patna High Court dismissed Bhim Sen Kumar's contempt application against CRPF authorities, finding substantial compliance with its previous October 2025 order directing the DIGP to consider the petitioner's representation regarding APAR (Annual Performance Appraisal Report) grading and MACP (Modified Assured Career Progression) benefits. The DIGP issued a December 2025 order addressing the petitioner's grievance regarding below-benchmark APARs (2016-2021) and confirming MACP eligibility from August 2021, with APAR upgradation to be considered through appellate authority review. The court permitted the petitioner to separately challenge the DIGP's December order through appropriate legal remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case