Suresh Baitha, vs The State of Bihar through Sri C. K. Anil the Principal Secretary-cum-Additional Chief Secretary, — MJC/4097/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC011287702025

e-Filing Number

10-12-2025

Filing Number

MJC/29421/2025

Filing Date

11-Dec-2025

Registration No

MJC/4097/2025

Registration Date

12-Dec-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Courts Act Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suresh Baitha,

    Adv. Suresh Prasad Bhakta,JYOTI KUMARI,JYOTI KUMARI, JYOTI KUMARI

  2. 2.Shambhu Baitha @ Shambhunath Baitha,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar through Sri C. K. Anil the Principal Secretary-cum-Additional Chief Secretary,

    Adv. ,Rajni Kant Singh 1123

  2. 2.Sri Giriwar Dayal Singh, the Secretary, Board of Revenue, Bihar,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    The court disposed of the contempt petition against Opposite Party No. 2 for willful violation of the court's order dated 19.08.2025, after the state counsel undertook to take immediate steps for disposal of the representation before the Collector, Gopalganj. The petitioner was granted leave to agitate the matter afresh if the opposite party fails to comply with this undertaking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/4097/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the contempt petition against Opposite Party No. 2 for willful violation of the court's order dated 19.08.2025, after the state counsel undertook to take immediate steps for disposal of the representation before the Collector, Gopalganj. The petitioner was granted leave to agitate the matter afresh if the opposite party fails to comply with this undertaking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case