Ram Prakash vs The Union of India Advocate - Additional Solicitor General, ,Rajan Ghoshrave — CWJC/1018/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC011257152023
e-Filing Number
11-12-2023
Filing Number
CWJC/27656/2023
Filing Date
23-Dec-2023
Registration No
CWJC/1018/2024
Registration Date
18-Jan-2024
Judge
Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy
Coram
Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
COMP.GRND. , BANK SER. ( 2909 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ram Prakash
Adv. Baban Kumar,Sanjay Kumar,Sanjay Kumar, ,Sanjay Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Union of India Advocate - Additional Solicitor General, ,Rajan Ghoshrave
-
2.The General Manager,
-
3.The Senior Manager,
Adv. Rajan Ghoshrave
-
4.The Branch Manager,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Mr. Justice Partha SarthyView PDF
The Patna High Court set aside Canara Bank's rejection of Ram Prakash's compassionate appointment application, finding the bank's November 2023 rejection letter lacked adequate consideration of the family's financial hardship following his father's death in 2019. The court directed the bank to reconsider the application within two months, properly evaluating whether the family's available income sources adequately meet dependents' needs, rather than relying solely on terminal benefits received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
For Admission -I
Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy
-
27-Feb-2026
For Admission
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman
-
26-Feb-2026
For Admission
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman
-
24-Feb-2026
For Admission
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman
-
23-Feb-2026
For Admission
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman
-
20-Feb-2026
For Admission
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman
-
19-Feb-2026
For Admission
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman
-
17-Feb-2026
For Admission
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman
-
16-Feb-2026
For Admission
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman
-
12-Feb-2026
For Admission
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman
-
11-Feb-2026
For Admission
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman
-
10-Feb-2026
For Admission
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman
-
06-Feb-2026
For Admission
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman
-
04-Feb-2026
For Admission
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman
-
03-Feb-2026
For Admission
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman
-
03-Jan-2025
For Admission
Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh
-
20-Dec-2024
For Admission
Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh
-
16-Dec-2024
For Admission
Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh
-
13-Dec-2024
For Admission
Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh
-
12-Dec-2024
For Admission
Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh
-
11-Dec-2024
For Admission
Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh
-
10-Dec-2024
For Admission
Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh
-
09-Dec-2024
For Admission
Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh
-
06-Dec-2024
For Admission
Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh
-
04-Dec-2024
For Admission
Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh
-
03-Dec-2024
For Admission
Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh
-
02-Dec-2024
For Admission
Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh
-
29-Nov-2024
For Admission
Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh
-
28-Nov-2024
For Admission
Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh
-
27-Nov-2024
For Admission
Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh
-
26-Nov-2024
For Admission
Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh
-
25-Nov-2024
For Admission
Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh
-
22-Nov-2024
For Admission
Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh
-
26-Apr-2024
For Admission
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
-
25-Apr-2024
For Admission
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
-
18-Apr-2024
For Admission - Fresh Cases
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
-
19-Jan-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Dec-2023
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/1018/2024
The Patna High Court set aside Canara Bank's rejection of Ram Prakash's compassionate appointment application, finding the bank's November 2023 rejection letter lacked adequate consideration of the family's financial hardship following his father's death in 2019. The court directed the bank to reconsider the application within two months, properly evaluating whether the family's available income sources adequately meet dependents' needs, rather than relying solely on terminal benefits received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts