Md. Shamim Darzi vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/941/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC011241182024
e-Filing Number
13-12-2024
Filing Number
CWJC/28564/2024
Filing Date
13-Dec-2024
Registration No
CWJC/941/2025
Registration Date
21-Jan-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 6700 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Md. Shamim Darzi
Adv. Ratanakar Jha
-
2.Noor Mohammad,
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
Adv. ,Nilendu Kumar Choudhary 1123
-
2.The Collector Madhubani,
-
3.The Sub Divisional Officer,
-
4.The D.C.L.R.,
-
5.The Circle Officer,
-
6.The Municipal Corporation,
-
7.The Chairman,
-
8.The Municipal Commissioner,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary: CWJC/941/2025 The Patna High Court disposed of the writ petition by Md. Shamim Darzi and Noor Mohammad challenging drainage construction on their land in Madhubani. After both the Municipal Corporation and State Revenue Authorities filed affidavits confirming that no construction had actually taken place on the petitioners' property, Justice Rajiv Roy granted the petitioners liberty to approach the Collector, Madhubani with their grievances while disposing of the petition without commenting on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Mar-2025
For Admission - Fresh Cases
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman
-
22-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/941/2025
Case Summary: CWJC/941/2025 The Patna High Court disposed of the writ petition by Md. Shamim Darzi and Noor Mohammad challenging drainage construction on their land in Madhubani. After both the Municipal Corporation and State Revenue Authorities filed affidavits confirming that no construction had actually taken place on the petitioners' property, Justice Rajiv Roy granted the petitioners liberty to approach the Collector, Madhubani with their grievances while disposing of the petition without commenting on its merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts