Smt. Neelam Sinha, vs Magadh University — MJC/4993/2019

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC011235572019

Filing Number

MJC/38495/2019

Filing Date

28-Nov-2019

Registration No

MJC/4993/2019

Registration Date

28-Nov-2019

Judge

Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah

Coram

Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Courts Act Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Neelam Sinha,

    Adv. Subodh Kumar Sinha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Magadh University

    Adv. ,Anil Singh,Md. Faiz Ahmad,Alok Kr.Rahi,Ashish Giri,Ritesh Kumar,Harsh Singh 1123

  2. 2.Shri Rajendra Prasad,

  3. 3.Shri Captain Jagat Singh Rana,

  4. 4.Shri Pyare Mohan Sahay,

  5. 5.The State of Bihar

  6. 6.The Authorized Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar ShahView PDF

    Summary: The Patna High Court dismissed the petition filed by Smt. Neelam Sinha against Magadh University and the State of Bihar for non-prosecution. The court found that the petitioner's counsel failed to appear on multiple occasions despite repeated calls, demonstrating lack of interest in prosecuting the case. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah accordingly dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    For Orders (On Petitions) - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah

  4. 06-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 28-Nov-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/4993/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Patna High Court dismissed the petition filed by Smt. Neelam Sinha against Magadh University and the State of Bihar for non-prosecution. The court found that the petitioner's counsel failed to appear on multiple occasions despite repeated calls, demonstrating lack of interest in prosecuting the case. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah accordingly dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case