Ram Balak Rai alias Ram Balak Ray vs The State of Bihar through Divesh Sehara, Principal Secretary Department of Panchayati Raj — MJC/4354/2024
Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 10,12. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 19th June 2026.
CNR: BRHC011226262024
e-Filing Number
10-12-2024
Filing Number
MJC/28172/2024
Filing Date
11-Dec-2024
Registration No
MJC/4354/2024
Registration Date
16-Dec-2024
Judge
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
Coram
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ram Balak Rai alias Ram Balak Ray
Adv. RAVISH MISHRA,Keertika Sakshi,Keertika Sakshi, ,Keertika Sakshi
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar through Divesh Sehara, Principal Secretary Department of Panchayati Raj
-
2.Saravanan M., Commissioner,
-
3.Yashpal Meena, District Magistrate,
-
4.Harendra Ram, District Panchayati Raj Officer,
-
5.Kishnay Kushwaha, Sub-Divisional Officer,
-
6.Prashant Kumar, Block Development Officer,
-
7.Uday Kumar, Block Development Officer,
-
8.Anand Prakash, Block Development Officer, Raghopur,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar ShahView PDF
Case Summary: MJC/4354/2024 The Patna High Court dismissed the petition of Ram Balak Rai (retired Panchayat Sachiv) against the State of Bihar and various officials on 19-06-2026 after the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal with no objection from the State. The court granted the withdrawal request, dismissing the case as not pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
For Admission - Tied Up
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
-
11-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/4354/2024
Case Summary: MJC/4354/2024 The Patna High Court dismissed the petition of Ram Balak Rai (retired Panchayat Sachiv) against the State of Bihar and various officials on 19-06-2026 after the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal with no objection from the State. The court granted the withdrawal request, dismissing the case as not pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts