Naresh Sundaram vs The State of Bihar — MJC/4883/2019
Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 12. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC011206802019
Filing Number
MJC/37690/2019
Filing Date
21-Nov-2019
Registration No
MJC/4883/2019
Registration Date
21-Nov-2019
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Naresh Sundaram
Adv. Rajesh Kumar Sinha
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.Mr. R.K. Mahajan,
-
3.Mr. Rahul Singh,
-
4.Dr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh,
-
5.Md. Mansoor Alam,
-
6.Mr. Dinesh Choudhary,
-
7.Mr. Ranjan Kumar,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Summary of MJC/4883/2019 Naresh Sundaram, an Assistant Teacher, filed a contempt petition against Bihar government officials for alleged willful disobedience of a prior court order dated 06.09.2019. The High Court found that the Additional Chief Education Department had rejected the petitioner's claim vide order dated 21.10.2025, and disposed of the contempt petition while granting the petitioner liberty to agitate any remaining grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
To Be Mentioned
Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha
-
16-Feb-2026
For Orders (On Office Notes)
Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha
-
16-Dec-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Nov-2019
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/4883/2019
Summary of MJC/4883/2019 Naresh Sundaram, an Assistant Teacher, filed a contempt petition against Bihar government officials for alleged willful disobedience of a prior court order dated 06.09.2019. The High Court found that the Additional Chief Education Department had rejected the petitioner's claim vide order dated 21.10.2025, and disposed of the contempt petition while granting the petitioner liberty to agitate any remaining grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts