Chandra Kala Devi vs The State of Bihar — MJC/4813/2019
Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC011191922019
Filing Number
MJC/37247/2019
Filing Date
19-Nov-2019
Registration No
MJC/4813/2019
Registration Date
19-Nov-2019
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Chandra Kala Devi
Adv. Anil Kumar Mukund,Purnendu Keshav,Purnendu Keshav, ,Rekha Kumari ( Mukund),Anirudh Pandey,Purnendu Keshav
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.Shailja Sharma,
-
3.K. Senthil Kumar,
-
4.Rajesh Kumar,
-
5.Shamshad Khan,
-
6.Rajesh Kumar,
-
7.Rajendra Kumar,
-
8.Dhirendra Kumar Jha
-
9.Birendra Kumar
-
10.Md. Rafique Kalim Ansari,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Chandra Kala Devi filed a contempt petition seeking initiation of proceedings against State of Bihar officials for willfully disobeying a court order dated 29.05.2019. The High Court found that the District Magistrate, Saharsa had complied with the order by appointing the petitioner (serial no. 13) vide order dated 22.11.2019. The petition was disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate any remaining grievances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Jul-2022
Miscellaneous
The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima
-
19-Nov-2019
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/4813/2019
Chandra Kala Devi filed a contempt petition seeking initiation of proceedings against State of Bihar officials for willfully disobeying a court order dated 29.05.2019. The High Court found that the District Magistrate, Saharsa had complied with the order by appointing the petitioner (serial no. 13) vide order dated 22.11.2019. The petition was disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate any remaining grievances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts