Shailesh Kumar vs The State of Bihar — MJC/4782/2019

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 12. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC011184382019

Filing Number

MJC/37062/2019

Filing Date

16-Nov-2019

Registration No

MJC/4782/2019

Registration Date

16-Nov-2019

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 12
Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shailesh Kumar

    Adv. Mithilesh Kumar Upadhyay

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.The Divisional Commissioner,

  3. 3.The District Magistrate,

  4. 4.The District Development Commissioner,

  5. 5.The Deputy Collector,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Case Summary - MJC/4782/2019: Shailesh Kumar filed a contempt petition seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against Bihar state officials for willful disobedience of a court order dated 05.09.2016 passed in an earlier civil writ case. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the petition by granting the petitioner liberty to agitate the matter further if any grievance remained unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jul-2024

    Lokadalat ( For Orders )

    Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar

  4. 09-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Nov-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/4782/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - MJC/4782/2019: Shailesh Kumar filed a contempt petition seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against Bihar state officials for willful disobedience of a court order dated 05.09.2016 passed in an earlier civil writ case. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the petition by granting the petitioner liberty to agitate the matter further if any grievance remained unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case