Fekni Devi and Ors vs Ramesh Kumar Rai Advocate - Arpana Kumari, ,TEJASKAR ANAND — SA/170/2018

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 07-Sep-2018

CNR: BRHC011176412018

Filing Number

SA/39968/2018

Filing Date

25-Apr-2018

Registration No

SA/170/2018

Registration Date

25-Apr-2018

Judge

Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

Coram

Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SECOND APPEAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

SA ( 15027 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Fekni Devi and Ors

    Adv. Surendra Kishore Thakur,Ashutosh Kumar,Ashutosh Kumar, ,Ravi Shankar Kumar,Sanjeev Kumar,Anjeev Kumar Singh,Y. MADHAVI,Surendra Kishore Thakur,Ashutosh Kumar

  2. 2.Tubhia Devi,

    Adv. Ravi Shankar Kumar Y. MADHAVI Anjeev Kumar Singh Sanjeev Kumar Surendra Kishore Thakur Ashutosh Kumar

  3. 3.Bonia Devi,

    Adv. Ravi Shankar Kumar Y. MADHAVI Anjeev Kumar Singh Sanjeev Kumar Surendra Kishore Thakur Ashutosh Kumar

  4. 4.Naresh Mahaldar,

    Adv. Ravi Shankar Kumar Y. MADHAVI Anjeev Kumar Singh Sanjeev Kumar Surendra Kishore Thakur Ashutosh Kumar

  5. 5.Shrawan Mahaldar,

    Adv. Ravi Shankar Kumar Y. MADHAVI Anjeev Kumar Singh Sanjeev Kumar Surendra Kishore Thakur Ashutosh Kumar

  6. 6.Md. Hushna, (Legal Heir)

    Adv. Ravi Shankar Kumar Y. MADHAVI Anjeev Kumar Singh Sanjeev Kumar Surendra Kishore Thakur Ashutosh Kumar6.

  7. 7.Sheikh Laddu6.

  8. 8.Sheikh Bablu

  9. 9.Manoj Tanti,

    Adv. Ravi Shankar Kumar Y. MADHAVI Anjeev Kumar Singh Sanjeev Kumar Surendra Kishore Thakur Ashutosh Kumar

  10. 10.Bimla Devi,

    Adv. Ravi Shankar Kumar Y. MADHAVI Anjeev Kumar Singh Sanjeev Kumar Surendra Kishore Thakur Ashutosh Kumar

  11. 11.Mina Devi, (Legal Heir)9.

  12. 12.Pankaj Kumar9.

  13. 13.Jugesh Tanti9.

  14. 14.Puja Devi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramesh Kumar Rai Advocate - Arpana Kumari, ,TEJASKAR ANAND

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Khatim RezaView PDF

  3. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Khatim RezaView PDF

  4. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Khatim RezaView PDF

  5. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Khatim RezaView PDF

  6. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Khatim RezaView PDF

    Case Summary: SA/170/2018 The Patna High Court dismissed the defendants' second appeal, upholding the appellate court's decision that favored the respondent (original plaintiff) in a land title dispute. The court found the plaintiff had validly purchased 24,480 sq. ft. of land through a registered sale deed in 2010 from vendors with established title, and that defendants unlawfully encroached 9,282 sq. ft. by constructing a hut. The court rejected defendants' oral "Hukumnama" claim and adverse possession defense, finding no documentary evidence supporting either claim and ruling such inconsistent pleas impermissible under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  11. 07-Jan-2026

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  12. 06-Jan-2026

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  13. 15-Dec-2025

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  14. 09-Dec-2025

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  15. 05-Dec-2025

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  16. 08-Aug-2025

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  17. 06-Aug-2025

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  18. 05-Aug-2025

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  19. 04-Aug-2025

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  20. 29-Jul-2025

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  21. 29-Jul-2025

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  22. 28-Jul-2025

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  23. 25-Jul-2025

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  24. 23-Jul-2025

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  25. 22-Jul-2025

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  26. 21-Jul-2025

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  27. 18-Jul-2025

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  28. 18-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 25-Apr-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/170/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SA/170/2018 The Patna High Court dismissed the defendants' second appeal, upholding the appellate court's decision that favored the respondent (original plaintiff) in a land title dispute. The court found the plaintiff had validly purchased 24,480 sq. ft. of land through a registered sale deed in 2010 from vendors with established title, and that defendants unlawfully encroached 9,282 sq. ft. by constructing a hut. The court rejected defendants' oral "Hukumnama" claim and adverse possession defense, finding no documentary evidence supporting either claim and ruling such inconsistent pleas impermissible under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case