Dheeraj Kumar vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/18306/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC011156172025
e-Filing Number
08-11-2025
Filing Number
CWJC/26755/2025
Filing Date
10-Nov-2025
Registration No
CWJC/18306/2025
Registration Date
14-Nov-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
MUTATION ACT ( 6200 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dheeraj Kumar
Adv. Suneil Kumar Thakur
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.The Collector-cum-District Magistrate,
-
3.The Additional Collector,
-
4.The Land Reforms Deputy Collector,
-
5.The Circle Officer, Lalganj,
-
6.The Revenue Officer, Lalganj,
-
7.Chandeshwar Prasad Singh,
Adv. Sanjay Kumar @ S.K.,Anjana
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary: CWJC/18306/2025 Dheeraj Kumar challenged the Revenue Officer's dismissal of his mutation application for 30 decimals of land in Vaishali district. The High Court disposed of the writ petition, directing the Land Reforms Deputy Collector to hear and decide the petitioner's fresh petition within four weeks, preferably by year-end, in compliance with earlier appellate orders favoring the petitioner's land claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Jan-2026
For Admission - Fresh Cases
Mr. Justice A. Abhishek Reddy
-
15-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/18306/2025
Case Summary: CWJC/18306/2025 Dheeraj Kumar challenged the Revenue Officer's dismissal of his mutation application for 30 decimals of land in Vaishali district. The High Court disposed of the writ petition, directing the Land Reforms Deputy Collector to hear and decide the petitioner's fresh petition within four weeks, preferably by year-end, in compliance with earlier appellate orders favoring the petitioner's land claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts