Banarasi Sah vs The State of Bihar through Sri Brajesh Mehrotra, the Principal Secretary, — MJC/3902/2024

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 11,12. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC011105912024

e-Filing Number

28-10-2024

Filing Number

MJC/25115/2024

Filing Date

29-Oct-2024

Registration No

MJC/3902/2024

Registration Date

11-Nov-2024

Judge

Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah

Coram

Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 11,12
Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Banarasi Sah

    Adv. Subodh Kumar Barnwal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar through Sri Brajesh Mehrotra, the Principal Secretary,

  2. 2.Sri Mukul Kumar Gupta, The Collector,

  3. 3.Sri Avinash Kumar Pandey, the Circle Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar ShahView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Patna disposed of Banarasi Sah's writ petition regarding an encroachment matter after the petitioner's counsel confirmed that the encroachment had been removed, thereby complying with the Court's previous order dated 20.06.2023. The petition was disposed of as the relief sought had been accomplished. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah

  4. 29-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/3902/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Patna disposed of Banarasi Sah's writ petition regarding an encroachment matter after the petitioner's counsel confirmed that the encroachment had been removed, thereby complying with the Court's previous order dated 20.06.2023. The petition was disposed of as the relief sought had been accomplished. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case