Md. Arif Sakir vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/18624/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Nov-2025

CNR: BRHC011081902025

e-Filing Number

09-10-2025

Filing Number

CWJC/24936/2025

Filing Date

13-Oct-2025

Registration No

CWJC/18624/2025

Registration Date

17-Nov-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar

Coram

Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

ARMS ACT ( 11500 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Md. Arif Sakir

    Adv. Manisha Pandey,Shweta Pandey,Shweta Pandey, ,Shweta Pandey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.The District Magistrate,

  3. 3.The Senior Superintendent of Police,

  4. 4.The Station House Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Ajit KumarView PDF

    Case Summary (CWJC/18624/2025): The Patna High Court directed the District Magistrate to adjudicate petitioner Md. Arif Sakir's pending arms license application for a handgun within eight weeks. The application, filed in November 2023, had remained pending without decision. Justice Ajit Kumar ordered that the final decision be communicated to the petitioner within the prescribed timeframe, disposing the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Nov-2025

    For Orders (On Office Notes)

  4. 13-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/18624/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary (CWJC/18624/2025): The Patna High Court directed the District Magistrate to adjudicate petitioner Md. Arif Sakir's pending arms license application for a handgun within eight weeks. The application, filed in November 2023, had remained pending without decision. Justice Ajit Kumar ordered that the final decision be communicated to the petitioner within the prescribed timeframe, disposing the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case