Chandravanshi Kumar vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/16268/2023
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC011056192023
e-Filing Number
18-10-2023
Filing Number
CWJC/23108/2023
Filing Date
19-Oct-2023
Registration No
CWJC/16268/2023
Registration Date
22-Nov-2023
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 6700 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Chandravanshi Kumar
Adv. Devendra Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department,
-
3.The District Magistrate,
-
4.The District Panchayati Raj Officer,
-
5.The Sub-divisional Officer,
-
6.Deputy Development Commissioner,
-
7.The Block Development Officer,
-
8.The Circle Officer, Circle- Sheohar,
-
9.The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj,
-
10.Nathuni Kumar @ Nathuni Sahni,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary: CWJC/16268/2023 Chandravanshi Kumar sought a mandamus to ban construction of a Panchayat Bhawan on disputed land (Khata No. 222, Khesra No. 1005) given by private respondent Nathuni Kumar, contending the land was not the respondent's property and that construction would obstruct public access to a long-used road. The High Court of Patna disposed of the petition after the petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal to approach appropriate authorities regarding alleged high-handedness, with the court declining to comment on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Nov-2023
For Admission - Fresh Cases
-
19-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/16268/2023
Case Summary: CWJC/16268/2023 Chandravanshi Kumar sought a mandamus to ban construction of a Panchayat Bhawan on disputed land (Khata No. 222, Khesra No. 1005) given by private respondent Nathuni Kumar, contending the land was not the respondent's property and that construction would obstruct public access to a long-used road. The High Court of Patna disposed of the petition after the petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal to approach appropriate authorities regarding alleged high-handedness, with the court declining to comment on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts