Awadhesh Prasad Singh, vs Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate - Rajesh Prasad Choudhary, ,Shailendra Kumar Singh,Sanjeev Kumar — MJC/4082/2019
Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 11,12. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC011016832019
Filing Number
MJC/32339/2019
Filing Date
24-Sep-2019
Registration No
MJC/4082/2019
Registration Date
24-Sep-2019
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Awadhesh Prasad Singh,
Adv. Sahvind Kumar Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate - Rajesh Prasad Choudhary, ,Shailendra Kumar Singh,Sanjeev Kumar
-
2.Md. Gulam Hussain,
-
3.Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary - MJC/4082/2019 Awadhesh Prasad Singh filed a contempt petition against officials of Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation and Bihar State Co-operative Land Development Bank Samiti for willful disobedience of a court order dated 10.12.2018. The Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's contempt claim through a reasoned order dated 06.01.2020. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the petition while granting the petitioner liberty to agitate the matter if grievances persist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jul-2024
Lokadalat ( For Orders )
Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh
-
24-Sep-2019
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/4082/2019
Case Summary - MJC/4082/2019 Awadhesh Prasad Singh filed a contempt petition against officials of Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation and Bihar State Co-operative Land Development Bank Samiti for willful disobedience of a court order dated 10.12.2018. The Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's contempt claim through a reasoned order dated 06.01.2020. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the petition while granting the petitioner liberty to agitate the matter if grievances persist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts