Afsana Parveen and Anr vs The State Of Bihar Through District Magistrate, Supaul and Ors — MJC/3693/2017

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010995022017

Filing Number

MJC/102556/2017

Filing Date

19-Dec-2017

Registration No

MJC/3693/2017

Registration Date

19-Dec-2017

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Afsana Parveen and Anr

    Adv. Jitendra Kishore Verma,Anjani Kumar,Anjani Kumar, ,Abhishek Anand,Surendra Kishore Verma,Anjani Kumar

  2. 2.Md. Rizawaan Jamalauddin

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Bihar Through District Magistrate, Supaul and Ors

  2. 2.Sri Baidyanath Prasad Yadav

  3. 3.Sri Ravindra Kumar Chaupal, the Circle Officer, Nirmali, Supaul.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: The Patna High Court disposed of a contempt petition filed by Afsana Parveen and Md. Rizawaan Jamalauddin against state officials for allegedly violating a March 21, 2017 court order regarding land encroachment removal. After the respondents demonstrated that the land had been cleared of encroachments, Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the petition while granting the petitioners liberty to file further grievances if issues persist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Dec-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/3693/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Patna High Court disposed of a contempt petition filed by Afsana Parveen and Md. Rizawaan Jamalauddin against state officials for allegedly violating a March 21, 2017 court order regarding land encroachment removal. After the respondents demonstrated that the land had been cleared of encroachments, Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the petition while granting the petitioners liberty to file further grievances if issues persist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case