Mazharul Haque @ Majharul Haque vs The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, — MJC/3449/2024

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 11,12. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010990642024

e-Filing Number

13-09-2024

Filing Number

MJC/22086/2024

Filing Date

25-Sep-2024

Registration No

MJC/3449/2024

Registration Date

28-Sep-2024

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 11,12
Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mazharul Haque @ Majharul Haque

    Adv. Satyendra Rai

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary,

  2. 2.Sri Maqsood Alam

  3. 3.Abhishek Kumar Chandan

  4. 4.Sri Birbal Varun Kumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    The Patna High Court dismissed Mazharul Haque's contempt petition against state officials for alleged willful disobedience of a December 1, 2022 order in an earlier encroachment removal case. The court found that the opposite parties' show cause response demonstrated the encroachment had already been removed, thereby nullifying the contempt claim. The petitioner was granted liberty to file further grievances if any issues remained unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Lokadalat ( For Orders )

    Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

  4. 25-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/3449/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Patna High Court dismissed Mazharul Haque's contempt petition against state officials for alleged willful disobedience of a December 1, 2022 order in an earlier encroachment removal case. The court found that the opposite parties' show cause response demonstrated the encroachment had already been removed, thereby nullifying the contempt claim. The petitioner was granted liberty to file further grievances if any issues remained unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case