Jaibun Khatoon vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/15425/2023

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 30-Oct-2023

CNR: BRHC010984532023

e-Filing Number

05-10-2023

Filing Number

CWJC/21530/2023

Filing Date

05-Oct-2023

Registration No

CWJC/15425/2023

Registration Date

21-Oct-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

LAND ACQUISITION ( 5900 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jaibun Khatoon

    Adv. Sunil Kumar Pandey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.The Divisional Commissioner,

  3. 3.The District Magistrate-cum-Collector,

  4. 4.The Additional Collector,

  5. 5.The District Land Acquisition Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: The Patna High Court disposed of Jaibun Khatoon's writ petition seeking compensation for land acquired for road construction in Muzaffarpur. The petitioner contended her residential property was wrongly classified as agricultural land, affecting compensation rates. The court permitted the petitioner to approach the Arbitrator-cum-Divisional Commissioner, Muzaffarpur for resolution, with the state's consent, directing the official to hear all parties and resolve the matter expeditiously based on the correct land classification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Oct-2023

    For Admission - Fresh Cases

  4. 05-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/15425/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Patna High Court disposed of Jaibun Khatoon's writ petition seeking compensation for land acquired for road construction in Muzaffarpur. The petitioner contended her residential property was wrongly classified as agricultural land, affecting compensation rates. The court permitted the petitioner to approach the Arbitrator-cum-Divisional Commissioner, Muzaffarpur for resolution, with the state's consent, directing the official to hear all parties and resolve the matter expeditiously based on the correct land classification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case