Arwind Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar Through Pramod Mahajan, The Principal Secretary Education Department, New Secret Advocate - Binay Kumar Singh, ,Awadhesh Prasad Sinha — MJC/2898/2017

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010971282017

Filing Number

MJC/78551/2017

Filing Date

22-Sep-2017

Registration No

MJC/2898/2017

Registration Date

22-Sep-2017

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Arwind Kumar Singh

    Adv. Ranjan Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Bihar Through Pramod Mahajan, The Principal Secretary Education Department, New Secret Advocate - Binay Kumar Singh, ,Awadhesh Prasad Sinha

  2. 2................

  3. 3............

  4. 4................

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: Arwind Kumar Singh filed a contempt petition seeking action against state officials for willfully disobeying a court order dated 28.01.2014 from the original civil writ case. The Patna High Court found that the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar had disposed of the petitioner's representation via memo dated 09.03.2022. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the contempt petition while granting the petitioner liberty to agitate the matter if any grievance remained unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Sep-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/2898/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Arwind Kumar Singh filed a contempt petition seeking action against state officials for willfully disobeying a court order dated 28.01.2014 from the original civil writ case. The Patna High Court found that the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar had disposed of the petitioner's representation via memo dated 09.03.2022. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the contempt petition while granting the petitioner liberty to agitate the matter if any grievance remained unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case