Dr. Baikunth Prasad Yadav vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Health, Medical Education And Fam — MJC/1696/2017

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010953422017

Filing Number

MJC/45477/2017

Filing Date

20-Jun-2017

Registration No

MJC/1696/2017

Registration Date

20-Jun-2017

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dr. Baikunth Prasad Yadav

    Adv. Bhubneshwar Prasad,SARBOTTAM KUMAR SARKAR,SARBOTTAM KUMAR SARKAR, ,Anjum Ara,SARBOTTAM KUMAR SARKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Health, Medical Education And Fam

  2. 2.Sri. R.K. Majahan,

  3. 3.The Accounts General A and E, Bihar Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: MJC/1696/2017 Dr. Baikunth Prasad Yadav filed a contempt petition against Bihar State officials for willful disobedience of a July 20, 2016 order from Civil Writ Case No. 9951 of 2014. The Patna High Court disposed of the petition as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the original order had been complied with, rendering the contempt proceeding unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Jun-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/1696/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MJC/1696/2017 Dr. Baikunth Prasad Yadav filed a contempt petition against Bihar State officials for willful disobedience of a July 20, 2016 order from Civil Writ Case No. 9951 of 2014. The Patna High Court disposed of the petition as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the original order had been complied with, rendering the contempt proceeding unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case