Punita Kumari vs The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development, Govt. Of Bihar, P Advocate - Md. Nadim Seraj, ,Apurva Kumar,Subhash Chandra Mishra (SC — MJC/792/2018
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010930372018
Filing Number
MJC/23844/2018
Filing Date
13-Mar-2018
Registration No
MJC/792/2018
Registration Date
13-Mar-2018
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Punita Kumari
Adv. Ratan Kumar Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development, Govt. Of Bihar, P Advocate - Md. Nadim Seraj, ,Apurva Kumar,Subhash Chandra Mishra (SC
-
2.The Vice Chancellor, L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
Adv. Apurva Kumar Subhash Chandra Mishra (SC
-
3.The Registrar, L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga.
Adv. Apurva Kumar Subhash Chandra Mishra (SC
-
4.The Finance Officer, L.N. Mithila University Darbhanga.
Adv. Apurva Kumar Subhash Chandra Mishra (SC
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary: MJC/792/2018 Punita Kumari filed a contempt petition against L.N. Mithila University and state officials for violating a prior court order directing payment of dues amounting to Rs. 21,92,795/-. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the petition after the University provided evidence that the full amount had been released to the petitioner, thereby satisfying the court's earlier directive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2018
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/792/2018
Case Summary: MJC/792/2018 Punita Kumari filed a contempt petition against L.N. Mithila University and state officials for violating a prior court order directing payment of dues amounting to Rs. 21,92,795/-. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the petition after the University provided evidence that the full amount had been released to the petitioner, thereby satisfying the court's earlier directive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts