Kapil Deo Prasad Singh vs The State Of Bihar and Ors — MJC/2175/2018

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 26-Sep-2018

CNR: BRHC010919772018

Filing Number

MJC/61900/2018

Filing Date

29-Jun-2018

Registration No

MJC/2175/2018

Registration Date

29-Jun-2018

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kapil Deo Prasad Singh

    Adv. Ram Janam Prasad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Bihar and Ors

    Adv. ,Raj Nandan Prasad 1123

  2. 2.Sri R.K. Mahajan, Commissioner-Cum-Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Gov

    Adv. Raj Nandan Prasad

  3. 3.Director Administration-cum- Additional Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. o

    Adv. Raj Nandan Prasad

  4. 4.The Accountant General Bihar,Birchand Patel Path Patna

    Adv. Raj Nandan Prasad

  5. 5.Treasury Officer, Hilsa

    Adv. Raj Nandan Prasad

  6. 6.Treasury Officer, Aurangabad, Bihar

    Adv. Raj Nandan Prasad

  7. 7.Zila Jan Siksha Padadhikari, Aurangabad

    Adv. Raj Nandan Prasad

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Kapil Deo Prasad Singh sought contempt proceedings against Bihar government officials for allegedly violating a March 19, 2018 court order. The court found that pension amounts had been transferred to the petitioner's bank account as required, disposing of the contempt petition while granting liberty to pursue further grievances if any remain. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Aug-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  4. 31-Jul-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  5. 24-Jul-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  6. 17-Jul-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  7. 10-Jul-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  8. 03-Jul-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  9. 26-Jun-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  10. 19-Jun-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  11. 15-May-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  12. 08-May-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  13. 01-May-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  14. 24-Apr-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  15. 17-Apr-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  16. 10-Apr-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  17. 03-Apr-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  18. 27-Mar-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  19. 13-Mar-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  20. 06-Mar-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  21. 27-Feb-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  22. 20-Feb-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  23. 13-Feb-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  24. 06-Feb-2019

    For Admission - Tied Up

    Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey

  25. 30-Jan-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 29-Jun-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/2175/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Kapil Deo Prasad Singh sought contempt proceedings against Bihar government officials for allegedly violating a March 19, 2018 court order. The court found that pension amounts had been transferred to the petitioner's bank account as required, disposing of the contempt petition while granting liberty to pursue further grievances if any remain. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case