Raj Kumar Sahni vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reform Department Advocate - Mujtabaul Haque — MJC/3083/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010918932025
e-Filing Number
28-08-2025
Filing Number
MJC/21095/2025
Filing Date
28-Aug-2025
Registration No
MJC/3083/2025
Registration Date
30-Aug-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
Coram
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
RESTORATION-SJ ( 200 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Raj Kumar Sahni
Adv. Pankaj Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reform Department Advocate - Mujtabaul Haque
-
2.The Additional Secretary,
-
3.The Collector,
-
4.The District Land Acquisition Officer,
-
5.The D.C.L.R.,
-
6.The Circle Officer,
-
7.The Officer In-charge,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar ShahView PDF
Case Summary: MJC/3083/2025 The Patna High Court restored a previously dismissed writ petition (CWJC No.2012 of 2024) filed by Raj Kumar Sahni against Bihar government land and revenue authorities. The original petition was dismissed for default due to non-compliance with a peremptory order, but the court granted restoration after the petitioner's counsel undertook to cure the procedural defects caused by unavailability of relevant documents, directing completion within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Sep-2025
Miscellaneous
The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima
-
28-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/3083/2025
Case Summary: MJC/3083/2025 The Patna High Court restored a previously dismissed writ petition (CWJC No.2012 of 2024) filed by Raj Kumar Sahni against Bihar government land and revenue authorities. The original petition was dismissed for default due to non-compliance with a peremptory order, but the court granted restoration after the petitioner's counsel undertook to cure the procedural defects caused by unavailability of relevant documents, directing completion within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts