Sachchi Devi vs The State Of Bihar Through The Collector and Ors — MJC/3221/2018

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010895982018

Filing Number

MJC/83694/2018

Filing Date

20-Aug-2018

Registration No

MJC/3221/2018

Registration Date

20-Aug-2018

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sachchi Devi

    Adv. Madan Prasad Singh No.2,SAGAR SUMAN,SAGAR SUMAN, SAGAR SUMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Bihar Through The Collector and Ors

  2. 2.Sri Anand Sharma,

  3. 3.Sri Shankar Prasad Singh,

  4. 4.Sri Vijay Kumar,

  5. 5.Sri Sanjeev Kumar,

  6. 6.Md. Anisurahman,

  7. 7.Sri Purnendu Verma,

  8. 8.Sri Ashok Kumar,

  9. 9.Sri Bal Krishna Bhalotiya,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: MJC/3221/2018 Sachchi Devi filed a contempt petition against Bihar state officials and others for allegedly violating a November 20, 2014 court order in an earlier civil case. The state respondents submitted that Sachchi Devi's land has not been utilized for construction. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the contempt petition, granting the petitioner liberty to agitate any remaining grievances through appropriate channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Aug-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/3221/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MJC/3221/2018 Sachchi Devi filed a contempt petition against Bihar state officials and others for allegedly violating a November 20, 2014 court order in an earlier civil case. The state respondents submitted that Sachchi Devi's land has not been utilized for construction. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the contempt petition, granting the petitioner liberty to agitate any remaining grievances through appropriate channels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case