Sheo Pujan Das vs The State Of Bihar — MJC/4817/2018

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010874372018

Filing Number

MJC/120126/2018

Filing Date

03-Dec-2018

Registration No

MJC/4817/2018

Registration Date

03-Dec-2018

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sheo Pujan Das

    Adv. Arvind Prasad Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Bihar

  2. 2.The Director

  3. 3.The Collector

  4. 4.The District Education Officer (DEO)

  5. 5.The Block Education Officer Block

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Summary: MJC/4817/2018 - Sheo Pujan Das v. State of Bihar The Patna High Court disposed of petitioner's contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a February 2018 order by Bihar education authorities regarding pension settlement. The State counsel presented evidence that revised pensioning papers had already been transmitted to the concerned authority, satisfying the court's concerns. Justice Rajiv Roy discharged the contempt petition while preserving the petitioner's right to file further grievances if issues persist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Dec-2019

    Lokadalat ( For Orders )

    Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah

  4. 30-Jan-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Dec-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/4817/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: MJC/4817/2018 - Sheo Pujan Das v. State of Bihar The Patna High Court disposed of petitioner's contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a February 2018 order by Bihar education authorities regarding pension settlement. The State counsel presented evidence that revised pensioning papers had already been transmitted to the concerned authority, satisfying the court's concerns. Justice Rajiv Roy discharged the contempt petition while preserving the petitioner's right to file further grievances if issues persist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case