Siya Singh vs The Bihar State Road Transport Corporation — L.P.A/829/2025
Case under Patna High Court Rules Section Clause 10. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010862932025
e-Filing Number
13-08-2025
Filing Number
L.P.A/19752/2025
Filing Date
13-08-2025
Registration No
L.P.A/829/2025
Registration Date
13-08-2025
Judge
The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Harish Kumar
Coram
The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Harish Kumar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
LPA ( 3 )
Sub-Category
LPA ( 15022 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Siya Singh
Adv. Raj Shekhar
Respondent(s)
The Bihar State Road Transport Corporation
Adv. P.K.Verma,Lakshmi Kant Tiwary 1123
The State of Bihar,
The Presiding Officer, Labour Court,
Hearing History
Judge: The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Harish Kumar
MISCELLANEOUS
FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CASES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-10-2025 | MISCELLANEOUS |
| 07-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CASES |
Orders
Case Summary: L.P.A 829/2025 - Siya Singh v. Bihar State Road Transport Corporation Court Decision: The Patna High Court allowed Siya Singh's Letters Patent Appeals, setting aside the Single Judge's order and upholding the Labour Court's 2013 award directing payment of Rs. 11,70,990 in back wages. The court rejected the Corporation's challenge to the award, holding that full back wages upon reinstatement following illegal dismissal is the normal rule under industrial law, and the foundational 2006 award granting back wages was never challenged, making the 2013 executing order unassailable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: L.P.A 829/2025 - Siya Singh v. Bihar State Road Transport Corporation Court Decision: The Patna High Court allowed Siya Singh's Letters Patent Appeals, setting aside the Single Judge's order and upholding the Labour Court's 2013 award directing payment of Rs. 11,70,990 in back wages. The court rejected the Corporation's challenge to the award, holding that full back wages upon reinstatement following illegal dismissal is the normal rule under industrial law, and the foundational 2006 award granting back wages was never challenged, making the 2013 executing order unassailable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts