Gopal Prasad Patel @ Gopal Prasad vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/13667/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010795892025
e-Filing Number
29-07-2025
Filing Number
CWJC/18216/2025
Filing Date
29-Jul-2025
Registration No
CWJC/13667/2025
Registration Date
23-Aug-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
LAND ACQUISITION ( 5900 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Gopal Prasad Patel @ Gopal Prasad
Adv. Ajay Kumar Pandey
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.The Principal Secretary, Land Reform,
-
3.The District Collector Cum Land Acquisition Officer,
-
4.The Sub-Divisional Officer,
-
5.The Circle Officer Bhagwanpur Hat Anchal,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary: CWJC/13667/2025 The Patna High Court disposed of an 84-year-old petitioner's writ petition challenging non-payment of land acquisition compensation for his property acquired for the Ram Janki Road Project (NH-227A). The court directed the petitioner to submit complete supporting documents within four weeks and expected the State to process and grant compensation if he is found eligible, citing the petitioner's advanced age. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Sep-2025
For Admission - Fresh Cases
Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri
-
25-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/13667/2025
Case Summary: CWJC/13667/2025 The Patna High Court disposed of an 84-year-old petitioner's writ petition challenging non-payment of land acquisition compensation for his property acquired for the Ram Janki Road Project (NH-227A). The court directed the petitioner to submit complete supporting documents within four weeks and expected the State to process and grant compensation if he is found eligible, citing the petitioner's advanced age. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts