Santosh Kumar vs The Union of India Advocate - Additional Solicitor General, Addl. Advocate General ( — CWJC/12666/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 06-Aug-2025

CNR: BRHC010764112025

e-Filing Number

22-07-2025

Filing Number

CWJC/17492/2025

Filing Date

22-Jul-2025

Registration No

CWJC/12666/2025

Registration Date

05-Aug-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

LAND ACQUISITION ( 5900 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Santosh Kumar

    Adv. Pramod Kumar Singh,Sanjay Kumar Singh,Sanjay Kumar Singh, ,Amit Kumar,Sanjay Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Union of India Advocate - Additional Solicitor General, Addl. Advocate General (

  2. 2.,RAM TUJABH SINGH

  3. 3.The General Manager (Personnel), East Central Railway,

  4. 4.The Divisional Railway Officer,

  5. 5.The Chief Personnel Officer,

  6. 6.The Senior Personnel Officer,

  7. 7.The Deputy Chief Engineer,

  8. 8.The State of Bihar,

  9. 9.The District Land Acquisition Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: CWJC/12666/2025 Santosh Kumar sought a writ from the Patna High Court requesting appointment for himself or a family member in Railway Group-C or D posts as compensation for land acquisition (21 decimals across two awards in 2017) for the Digha-Patna Railway Bridge-cum-Road Construction project. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the petition by granting the petitioner liberty to pursue appropriate alternative remedies for his grievance, rather than directing the specific relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Oct-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

  4. 14-Oct-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

  5. 13-Oct-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

  6. 10-Oct-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

  7. 08-Oct-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

  8. 07-Oct-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

  9. 26-Sep-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

  10. 24-Sep-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

  11. 23-Sep-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

  12. 22-Sep-2025

    For Admission - Fresh Cases

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

  13. 06-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 22-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/12666/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWJC/12666/2025 Santosh Kumar sought a writ from the Patna High Court requesting appointment for himself or a family member in Railway Group-C or D posts as compensation for land acquisition (21 decimals across two awards in 2017) for the Digha-Patna Railway Bridge-cum-Road Construction project. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the petition by granting the petitioner liberty to pursue appropriate alternative remedies for his grievance, rather than directing the specific relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case