Anju Kumari vs The State of Bihar — MJC/1834/2022

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010762822022

e-Filing Number

12-09-2022

Filing Number

MJC/17871/2022

Filing Date

12-Sep-2022

Registration No

MJC/1834/2022

Registration Date

15-Sep-2022

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Courts Act Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anju Kumari

    Adv. Amarendra Narayan,Deepak Kumar,Deepak Kumar, ,Deepak Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.Jitendra Srivastava,

  3. 3.Ashok Kumar

  4. 4.Dr. B. Rajender,

  5. 5.Smt. Ranchna Patil,

  6. 6.Nirmal Kumar,

  7. 7.Ram Anugrah Nr. Singh,

  8. 8.Kalika Prasad

  9. 9.Nityanand Prasad

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    In this contempt proceeding, Anju Kumari sought initiation of contempt action against Bihar government officials for willful disobedience of a May 19, 2022 order in Civil Writ Case No. 7931 of 2021. The court found that the arrears have been calculated and disbursed by the opposite parties. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the contempt petition while granting the petitioner liberty to agitate the matter regarding the interest component if any grievance remains. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-May-2023

    Miscellaneous

    The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima

  4. 12-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/1834/2022

casestatus.in Summary

In this contempt proceeding, Anju Kumari sought initiation of contempt action against Bihar government officials for willful disobedience of a May 19, 2022 order in Civil Writ Case No. 7931 of 2021. The court found that the arrears have been calculated and disbursed by the opposite parties. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the contempt petition while granting the petitioner liberty to agitate the matter regarding the interest component if any grievance remains. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case