Poonam Rani Sinha vs The State of Bihar, — MJC/1981/2021

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010753022021

e-Filing Number

26-10-2021

Filing Number

MJC/18046/2021

Filing Date

26-Oct-2021

Registration No

MJC/1981/2021

Registration Date

27-Oct-2021

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Courts Act Section 10,12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Poonam Rani Sinha

    Adv. Ram Sagar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar,

    Adv. ,Binod Kumar labh,Kumar Priya Ranjan 1123

  2. 2.Mr. Manoj Kumar,

  3. 3.Mr. Ram Chandra Mandal,

  4. 4.Mr. Sanjay Kumar Choudhary,

  5. 5.Mr. Dilip Kumar Singh,

  6. 6.Mr. Sharad Chandra Jhunjhunwala,

  7. 7.Mr. Ramavatar Sharma,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Summary: Poonam Rani Sinha filed a contempt petition seeking action against Bihar education officials for willful disobedience of a June 21, 2021 court order. However, the court disposed of the petition after the respondents submitted a notary affidavit showing full payment had been made and the petitioner had no remaining claims against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2022

    Lokadalat ( For Orders )

    Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad

  4. 11-May-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Oct-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/1981/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Poonam Rani Sinha filed a contempt petition seeking action against Bihar education officials for willful disobedience of a June 21, 2021 court order. However, the court disposed of the petition after the respondents submitted a notary affidavit showing full payment had been made and the petitioner had no remaining claims against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case