Chandra Prakash vs Mr. Chandrashekhar Singh, — MJC/1962/2021

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 11,12. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010743472021

e-Filing Number

22-10-2021

Filing Number

MJC/17830/2021

Filing Date

22-Oct-2021

Registration No

MJC/1962/2021

Registration Date

25-Oct-2021

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 11,12
Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chandra Prakash

    Adv. Umesh Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mr. Chandrashekhar Singh,

  2. 2.Mr. Chandrashekhar Singh,

  3. 3.Mr. Chandrashekhar Kumar,

  4. 4.Mr. Arun Kumar Mishra,

  5. 5.Smt. Rina Devi,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: Chandra Prakash sought contempt proceedings against state officials for alleged willful disobedience of a court order dated 30.07.2019. However, the petitioner's counsel accepted during hearing that the contested order had been fully complied with. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the contempt petition, granting the petitioner liberty to agitate any remaining grievance in future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Jun-2022

    Miscellaneous

    The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima

  4. 22-Oct-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/1962/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Chandra Prakash sought contempt proceedings against state officials for alleged willful disobedience of a court order dated 30.07.2019. However, the petitioner's counsel accepted during hearing that the contested order had been fully complied with. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the contempt petition, granting the petitioner liberty to agitate any remaining grievance in future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case