Nitesh Kumar vs The State of Bihar — MJC/1776/2022

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 10,11. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010740132022

e-Filing Number

05-09-2022

Filing Number

MJC/17345/2022

Filing Date

05-Sep-2022

Registration No

MJC/1776/2022

Registration Date

09-Sep-2022

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 10,11
Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nitesh Kumar

    Adv. Sanjay Kumar Singh

  2. 2.Nikhil Kumar

  3. 3.Pradeep Kumar Choudhary

  4. 4.Brajesh Kumar

  5. 5.Awnish Shree

  6. 6.Pravin Prasad

  7. 7.Mankeshwar Ram

  8. 8.Kusheshwar Chaturvedi

  9. 9.Sujeet Kumar Singh

  10. 10.Anil Kumar

  11. 11.Rabish Chandra Guprta

  12. 12.Akash

  13. 13.Chandrabhushan Kumar,

  14. 14.Kishore Kunal

  15. 15.Sujeet Kumar Sharma

  16. 16.Arif Khan

  17. 17.Dharmendra Kumar Singh

  18. 18.Nagendra Kumar

  19. 19.Radheshyam Kumar Singh

  20. 20.Mukesh Kumar Singh

  21. 21.Sanjay Kumar

  22. 22.Amar Kumar

  23. 23.Sanjeev Kumar

  24. 24.Nikhil Kumar

  25. 25.Manish Kumar,

  26. 26.Anil Kumar Singh

  27. 27.Rajeev Kumar

  28. 28.Anand Kumar

  29. 29.Prayag Kumar Singh,

  30. 30.Rahul Kumar Singh,

  31. 31.Rajiv Prakash,

  32. 32.Arvind Kumar Chaudhary,

  33. 33.Harshit Chauhan,

  34. 34.Jitendra Kumar,

  35. 35.Jaharuddin,

  36. 36.Shashikant Prasad

  37. 37.Deepak Kumar

  38. 38.Digamber Kishor Sinha,

  39. 39.Rohit Kumar

  40. 40.Om Prakash

  41. 41.Ghulam Ghaus

  42. 42.Ratnesh Kumar

  43. 43.Ankit Kumar Mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.The Principal Secrerary Department of General Administration,

  3. 3.The Principal Secrerary,

  4. 4.The District Magistrate-Cum-Collector,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: MJC/1776/2022 Court Decision: The Patna High Court dismissed the contempt petition, finding that the State of Bihar had complied with the court's order dated 25.01.2022 in the underlying civil writ case. The respondent state produced evidence (Annexure-4/1) demonstrating that the petitioners (43 assistant clerks in Saran district) had been granted the benefits ordered by the court. Key Outcome: Since compliance was established, the contempt proceedings were not initiated. The court reserved the petitioners' right to file fresh grievances if benefits remained unimplemented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2023

    Miscellaneous

    The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima

  4. 05-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/1776/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MJC/1776/2022 Court Decision: The Patna High Court dismissed the contempt petition, finding that the State of Bihar had complied with the court's order dated 25.01.2022 in the underlying civil writ case. The respondent state produced evidence (Annexure-4/1) demonstrating that the petitioners (43 assistant clerks in Saran district) had been granted the benefits ordered by the court. Key Outcome: Since compliance was established, the contempt proceedings were not initiated. The court reserved the petitioners' right to file fresh grievances if benefits remained unimplemented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case