HANUMAN SINGH AND OTHERS(Legal Heir) vs UDAI SHANKAR SINGH Advocate - Sunil Kumar Yadav — C.R./10/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 115. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010739782020

e-Filing Number

28-12-2020

Filing Number

C.R./17444/2020

Filing Date

28-Dec-2020

Registration No

C.R./10/2021

Registration Date

30-Jan-2021

Judge

Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya

Coram

Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 115

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HANUMAN SINGH AND OTHERS(Legal Heir)

    Adv. Nawnit Kumar Tiwary,Ramendra Pati Tripathy,Ramendra Pati Tripathy, ,Pandit Jee Pandey,Ramendra Pati Tripathy1.

  2. 2.Arun Singh,1.

  3. 3.Shashi Shekhar Singh,1.

  4. 4.Shri Krishna Singh,1.

  5. 5.Anjani Kumar1.

  6. 6.Amar Kumar Singh,

  7. 7.ANAND RAJ SINGH @ ANAND RAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UDAI SHANKAR SINGH Advocate - Sunil Kumar Yadav

  2. 2.SUMITRA DEVI

  3. 3.ABHINASH KUMAR

  4. 4.RITIK KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand MalviyaView PDF

    Case Summary C.R. No. 10 of 2021 – Patna High Court The Patna High Court dismissed the defendants' civil revision petition challenging the trial court's rejection of their application to dismiss the plaintiff's suit. The defendants argued the suit was barred by limitation and estoppel principles, claiming a 1983 partition agreement had been acted upon for 35 years. However, the court held that the plaintiff's claim was not a direct challenge to the partition but was based on subsequent transactions and alleged unauthorized alienation of lands, with interference occurring in 2018—raising questions of fact requiring trial evidence. The court found no patent illegality in the trial court's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    For Admission II

    Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    For Admission II

    Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    For Admission II

    Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya

  6. 19-Mar-2026

    For Admission II

    Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    For Orders (On Office Notes) - II

    Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya

  8. 17-Nov-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya

  9. 14-Aug-2024

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  10. 13-Aug-2024

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  11. 12-Aug-2024

    For Orders (On Petitions)-I

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  12. 01-Oct-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 28-Dec-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.R./10/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary C.R. No. 10 of 2021 – Patna High Court The Patna High Court dismissed the defendants' civil revision petition challenging the trial court's rejection of their application to dismiss the plaintiff's suit. The defendants argued the suit was barred by limitation and estoppel principles, claiming a 1983 partition agreement had been acted upon for 35 years. However, the court held that the plaintiff's claim was not a direct challenge to the partition but was based on subsequent transactions and alleged unauthorized alienation of lands, with interference occurring in 2018—raising questions of fact requiring trial evidence. The court found no patent illegality in the trial court's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case